Showbiz
Shannon McDonagh
Dec 28, 2020
Netflix
Period drama reimagining Bridgerton has made some serious waves since its Netflix debut in 2020 and returning for a second season in March 2022. Alarmingly, not everybody is on the same page the show spotlighting many people of colour.
Hailed as Gossip Girl-meets-Downton Abbey, Bridgerton is the first tv series media goddess Shonda Rhimes signed on to a multi-project deal with Netflix back in 2017.
In true Shondaland fashion, diversity has been a crucial feature of the series’ casting, leaving some viewers leaning on the incredibly outdated argument that people of colour shouldn’t feature as it isn’t ‘historically accurate’.
It’s not the first time the supposed issue of ‘historical accuracy’, with The Crown facing a lot of flack for trusting that their audiences can tell entertainment from real life. It seems to be the go-to argument for certain viewers once they are faced with content that makes them uncomfortable.
Sign up to our new free Indy100 weekly newsletter
In response to this, Twitter users are highlighting why these concerns are ultimately misguided, and that any artificial concern for history neglects to acknowledge that black people did in fact exist in the Regency period. Who knew!
Reporter Nadra Kareem clapped back to these discussions with ease, reminding critics that you have to look no further than the works of Jane Austen to find black representation in period fiction.
People are asking if it's historically accurate to have black characters in #Bridgerton & I want to point out that… https://t.co/3rcbPcr0eT— Nadra Nittle (@Nadra Nittle) 1608910691
The internet troll YTs are all up in arms over #Bridgerton because they believe black people only existed in histor… https://t.co/RCRAz1HYz4— The Cozy Kitty (@The Cozy Kitty) 1609000830
Actor Daniel York was one of many who doubled down on the multitudes of other things cynics should be concerned about outside of the inclusion of people of colour.
And Elizabethans were about 4’11” tall, had terrible skin, terrible teeth, STD’s, stank and dropped dead when they… https://t.co/gPIrN6hPdE— Daniel York Loh 😷 (@Daniel York Loh 😷) 1608982953
No one can talk about #Bridgerton being historically accurate when all these people have their teeth, no lice, aren… https://t.co/NbzvHZCkOc— Isabella “Anti-racist Baby” Price (@Isabella “Anti-racist Baby” Price) 1608947559
The author of the series Julia Quinn has praised the casting decision, telling People magazine that “it's incredibly important”.
She also explained that the show’s inclusion of Queen Charlotte - a real historical figure believed to have had “significant African ancestry” - was a powerful move that could help reimagine what the Regency period could have looked like.
"What if this was actually recognized and accepted at the time? What if she had used her position to elevate people of color to positions of power? What would society look like then?"
I knew it would be this way - knew it!! - and yet seeing "but is this historically accurate" as a way to complain a… https://t.co/1Y60KUITo2— Kathryn VanArendonk (@Kathryn VanArendonk) 1609014830
One writer also pointed out that if you’re going to be concerned about the historical existence of black people, you should also be concerned with the inclusion of modern music in many scenes.
"There will be fans of regency-era cosplay who will balk at seeing a London depicted w/ Black people, esp. in the a… https://t.co/mmtQdcC9Ju— Nicole Chung (@Nicole Chung) 1609006850
Surely a greater concern should be that Ariana Grande is definitely not over two centuries old.
Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.
Top 100
The Conversation (0)
x