Politics
Kate Plummer
Nov 30, 2022
content.jwplatform.com
Prime minister Rishi Sunak and leader of the opposition Keir Starmer have just had their weekly parliamentary ding-dong.
This week, the pair rattled through some of the biggest issues of the day from education to housing at alarming pace, scraping the surface of each one before discarding it for the next one - like children eating the foam off their parent's Cappuccino.
It gave us whiplash to watch and (spoiler alert) we weren't much impressed with either performance but who came out on top?
Here is our weekly rundown of everything that happened and how we rated it:
Sunak: "During Covid he wanted to keep schools closed... We shouldn't be surprised, I listen to parents, he listens to his union paymasters", 2/10
Starmer began proceedings by attacking Sunak on private school's tax status and even mentioned the school the prime minister himself went to, Winchester College.
Showing ducking ability that should see Sunak join a dodgeball team, the PM sidestepped the question and attacked Starmer over his Covid policies - that were obviously cooked up two years ago and are no longer relevant to the party's education plans - then got in a rabble rousing line about Starmer listening to the unions for bad measure.
His continued attempts to act like Starmer is 1970s style union leader are as false as they are embarrassing and refusing to answer the leader of the opposition's reasonable question about the use of taxpayers money was ridiculous.
He added that Labour's attempt to end tax breaks for private schools were an "attack on aspiration" motivated by "resentment".
Given some 7 per cent of people attend private schools, this is hardly a populist rallying cry.
\u201cLabour leader Keir Starmer asks Rishi Sunak why his alma mater Winchester College receieved a tax break of \u00a36million\n\nHe asks if that money would be used better in Southampton where 4 in 10 pupils fail their maths GCSE \n\n#PMQs\u201d— Ava-Santina (@Ava-Santina) 1669810139
Starmer: "He really does need to get out more," 7/10
So it is no wonder Starmer replied with this withering line which we enjoyed, before moving on to the issue of home ownership - or lack thereof in this country...
Starmer: "I love my kids but I don't want to be cooking them dinner in 30 years time," 9/10
He said that the rate of homebuilding was not good enough and that people born these days are unlikely to end up owning homes. Not only did he hammer this point home with the illustrative example of his children, he managed to get a joke in and show his personality as a Dad TM. A win on all fronts.
Sunak: "He's too weak to stop dozens of his MPs from joining the picket lines," 3/10
A flustered Sunak once again failed to paint Starmer as a union baron amid continued strike action in the country. Strikes, that as the public know, Starmer has nothing to do with.
Starmer: "Every week he hands out cash to those who don't need it, every week he gets pushed round and every week he gets weaker," 8/10
With Sunak floundering, Starmer delivered his killer blow and made the prime minister seem like a weak toddler being given a wedgie in the playground. He's been calling him weak for a few weeks now - sorry for the homophone - and it is working.
\u201cKeir Starmer describing Rishi Sunak as \u201cweak\u201d for second #PMQs in a row.\n\n\u201cEvery week he gets pushed around and every week he gets weaker\u201d.\n\nThe attack line used repeatedly by Tony Blair against John Major in run up to 1997 election.\u201d— Pippa Crerar (@Pippa Crerar) 1669810555
Sunak: "I'll take the tough decisions for this country. It's the politics of yesterday with him or the politics of tomorrow with me," 4/10
And so, the ghost of Boris Johnson reared his ugly head once again as Sunak banged on about "tough decisions" in response. It has been a good few weeks that he has been prime minister now, so surely he's had enough time to get his own style, rather than act like a crap tribute act.
As for the politics of tomorrow stuff, given New Labour's record in power, we think the politics of yesterday sound pretty great.
\u201cRishi Sunak, whose party is blocking new renewable and housebuilding projects, while erecting trade barriers with Europe that haven't existed for decades, accuses Keir Starmer of pursuing "the politics of yesterday". #PMQs\u201d— Adam Bienkov (@Adam Bienkov) 1669810540
Verdict
This edition felt a bit bitty, with no new big story dominating the political agenda this week or scandal to speak off, Starmer veered between topics but failed to get any real answers out of Sunak who played the man not the ball instead.
It was all a bit 'meh' and didn't leave us excited about the politicians we have in the country, but overall Starmer did a better job.
Here's some other hot takes.
\u201cClear win for Keir Starmer. #PMQs\u201d— Rachel Wearmouth (@Rachel Wearmouth) 1669810479
\u201cThese two haven't been going head-to-head for long, but the Starmer attack lines already bedded in. 'Weakness' "every week he gets pushed around & every week he gets weaker' & 'privilege' (public school education/private healthcare -raised by MPs rather than KS - non-doms) #PMQs\u201d— Beth Rigby (@Beth Rigby) 1669811076
It is a simple and fundamental principle that the government derives its democratic legitimacy from the people. The future of the country must not be decided by plotting and U-turns at Westminster; it must be decided by the people in a general election. And for this reason The Independent is calling for an election to be held. Have your say and sign our election petition by clicking here.
Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.
Top 100
The Conversation (0)
x