Another Wednesday, another PMQs…
Rishi Sunak faces questions for only the second time in the Commons, with leader of the opposition focusing on asylum processing in his line of interrogation.
Sunak made an uncertain start to life as leader of the country last time out and it was a question of whether he’d grow in stature during the second PMQs. The session also came just hours after Rishi Sunak announced his first major U-turn as PM, confirming that he would be attending the Cop27 climate summit in Egypt after all.
Sign up for our free Indy100 weekly newsletter
But who came out on top on Wednesday afternoon? See our verdict on the exchanges below.
Sunak: "Suella Braverman is getting on with her job" 2/10
The first question is a simple one - why is Home Secretary Suella Braverman still in a job.
Same answer from last week (that she “made an error of judgement” and has recognised her error) and just as unconvincing as it was then.
Starmer: "The asylum system is broken. Who broke it?" 8/10
Starmer starts strongly, quoting home secretary Braverman, who said that the “asylum system is broken” when the Tories have been in power for 12 years.
Sunak: “We delivered Brexit” 0/10
Failing to answer the question and instead turning the conversation to Brexit, Sunak already looks like he’ll be following the Johnson playbook of spouting the same non-sequiturs, jargon and rhetoric. His biggest plan of attack at the moment seems to be calling Starmer a remainer. It's a bad start.
Starmer: “Rwanda plan isn’t working” 7/10
Starmer again hits out at the government’s attempts to tackle illegal immigration, hitting out at the Rwanda deal which ‘isn’t working’ and cost UK taxpayers £120million. Starmer isn’t having to work hard to put the PM under pressure.
He goes on to accuse Sunak of ‘blaming others and deflecting’.
Sunak: ‘We have not processed enough asylum claims,’ 1/10
After being asked how many people that arrived in small boats to the UK had been processed for asylum claims, Sunak is forced to concede that “not enough” is the answer.
“That’s what we’re going to fix,” he says, before stating that the government had upped the number of processing officials by 80 per cent. Sunak doesn’t seem to be getting much support from the benches behind him.
Starmer: "Braverman has better chance of becoming PM than process an asylum claim in a year" 6/10
\u201cKeir Starmer - "Just 4% of people arriving on small boats, last year, had their asylum claim processed. According to the bookies the Home Secretary has a better chance of becoming the next Tory leader, than she has at processing an asylum claim in a year"\n\n#PMQs\u201d— Haggis_UK \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa (@Haggis_UK \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa) 1667391322
Again the leader of the opposition attacks Sunak on the government’s asylum record, stating that only four per cent of claimants have been processed properly. He then states that bookies have the odds of Braverman becoming PM in the next 12 months than processing a single applicant.
Sunak: "Significant action is being taken" 3/10
‘Significant steps to demonstrate we are getting a grip of this system’, according to Sunak. No one seems all that convinced...
Starmer: “Start governing for once,” 7/10
\u201cKeir Starmer - "Why doesn't he get a proper home secretary... & start governing for once, & get a grip"\n\n#PMQs\u201d— Haggis_UK \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa (@Haggis_UK \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7 \ud83c\uddea\ud83c\uddfa) 1667391877
Starmer seems to be gaining a little momentum as he criticises the PM’s “grubby deal” with Braverman to put her back in the job of home secretary – something which he touched on last week. He also calls for direct action, and the speaker is forced to step in to calm down the vociferous backbenchers.
Sunak: “This is the person who told the BBC in 2019 that Jeremy Corbyn would make a great Prime Minister,” 0/10
\u201cThe gall of Suella Braverman to shout \u201cshame\u201d at anyone right now. Surprised she even knows the word.\n#pmqs\u201d— Mark Conway (@Mark Conway) 1667391361
More desperate stuff from Sunak. The PM can’t get anything going in the chamber so far and instead reaches for the Johnson playbook once again. He points out that Starmer said in 2019 that he thought Corbyn would make a good prime minister. The Tories lap it up, but is this really all Sunak has got?
Verdict
Not a classic showdown in the Commons, it has to be said. Starmer tried to hammer Sunak on asylum seekers and largely did well. Braverman will continue to be an attack point for Labour as long as she remains in the job.
It was a really feeble effort in response from Sunak, and it also proved that is following Johnson’s tactics at the dispatch box. Chucking out the familiar unrelated points about ‘getting Brexit done’ when quizzed on asylum claimants feels like classic Johnson. Talking about Jeremy Corbyn in 2022, years after he was last on the Labour front bench, and after all the chaos that the Conservative party have embodied over recent months feels pretty pathetic too.
Sunak still fails to convince and while he certainly could have been stronger in his line of questioning, Starmer barely has to lift a finger to put him under pressure and get him to concede on the Conservative’s record of processing asylum applications.
Here's what others made of Wednesday's session.
\u201cSunak really struggling here. Shows how foolish it was of the government to try and make immigration a bigger issue, when the only thing the public agrees on (both pro and anti-migration voters) is that the government's record on it is poor. #PMQs\u201d— Adam Bienkov (@Adam Bienkov) 1667391028
\u201cRishi Sunak appears to have two stock answers for every Starmer question at #PMQs regardless of topic \n\n1) You backed Remain\n2) You served under Corbyn\u201d— John Stevens (@John Stevens) 1667391135
\u201cRishi dying on his feet at #PMQs\u201d— John Crace (@John Crace) 1667392064
\u201cThe Tories have been in power for 12 years. Instead of taking responsibility for their own failures - they will point the finger at anybody else.\n\nOut of ideas. Out of touch. Step aside and call an election. #PMQs\u201d— Dr Rosena Allin-Khan (@Dr Rosena Allin-Khan) 1667391199
\u201cAbsolute desperation from Rishi Sunak there trotting out the Corbyn and Remain lines after he took a pummelling today\n\nHe looked weak and wobbly rather than cool and confident \n\n#PMQs\u201d— Liam Thorp (@Liam Thorp) 1667391527
\u201cNewsflash for Rishi Sunak, at PMQs he is actually meant to answer questions put to him.\n\nSunak has failed to give a straight answer to even \u2018yes\u2019 or \u2018no\u2019 questions. Weak, weak, weak. #PMQs\u201d— Sarah Owen MP (@Sarah Owen MP) 1667391347
It is a simple and fundamental principle that the government derives its democratic legitimacy from the people. The future of the country must not be decided by plotting and U-turns at Westminster; it must be decided by the people in a general election. And for this reason The Independent is calling for an election to be held. Have your say and sign our election petition by clicking here.
Have your say in our news democracy. Click the upvote icon at the top of the page to help raise this article through the indy100 rankings.